TopList Update

[Kevy]

TopList has received an update today.
Now, when a forum member votes, the TopList Server get 2 votes instead of 1.
Guests still can only give 1 vote.

 

[RS Wiki]

ok ty.

 

[Leanbow]

Such an update, wow nice.

 

[BanEvader2332]

I can imagine someone creating a macro for this.

 

[B4WD]

I assume this is an April 1st fool. It better be, LOL.

 

[medic]

Okay, why though?

encourage players of servers to register i guess

OT: nicee

 

[Torva]

More incentive to join the rune-server community, i like it!

 

[Ariene]

idk if april fools joke, or real. but it will encourage more people to sign up on the forums. ;-;

 

[Motions]

Rune-server update? This april fools keeps getting better

 

[23286027318020]

Much updates, such wowe

Gj Kevy. Pro l33t codar.

 

[012951yvna8sgk]

Go ride your scooters Kevy.

 

[Luke132]

doesnt make sense, just a way for u to get more forum members wtf

 

[Danny]

Nice.

 

[Gander]

Do players actually use the toplist ?

 

[Milly]

Clever update.

 

[Roboyto]

You should make the number of votes correlate with the amount of posts the forum member has, thus incentivising posting on the forums and empowering members with large post counts.

 

[Kaleem]

You should make the number of votes correlate with the amount of posts the forum member has, thus incentivising posting on the forums and empowering members with large post counts.

That's one of the worst ideas I've ever heard

 

[Roboyto]

That's one of the worst ideas I've ever heard

Its essentially along the lines of the toplist update that just took place.

 

[Kaleem]

Its essentially along the lines of the toplist update that just took place.

No, it isn't. You are suggesting that the amount of votes should be equal to the users postcount, if they have one. With that, you have even more post-count whores, even more spam accounts, and someone with a huge post count could unfairly get a Server to the number 1 spot on the toplist

 

[Roboyto]

No, it isn't. You are suggesting that the amount of votes should be equal to the users postcount, if they have one. With that, you have even more post-count whores, even more spam accounts, and someone with a huge post count could unfairly get a Server to the number 1 spot on the toplist

I never said it was a fair idea, nor did I state an opinion on the idea.

I simply suggested it because the toplist update is sacrificing valid forum statistics in an attempt to boost the (perceived) popularity of the website, so why not go 1 step further.